States build anti-terror
database
Project resembles federal database thwarted by privacy fears
ASSOCIATED PRESS
NEW YORK, Sept. 23 While privacy worries are frustrating the Pentagons
plans for a far-reaching database to combat terrorism, a similar project
is quietly taking shape with the participation of more than a dozen states
and $12 million in federal funds.
THE DATABASE project, created so states and local authorities can track
would-be terrorists as well as criminal fugitives, is being built and
housed in the offices of a private company but will be open to some federal
law enforcers and perhaps even U.S. intelligence agencies.
Dubbed Matrix, the database has been in use for a year and a half in Florida,
where police praise the crime-fighting tool as nimble and exhaustive.
It cross-references the states driving records and restricted police
files with billions of pieces of public and private data, including credit
and property records.
But privacy advocates, officials in two states and a competing data vendor
have branded Matrix as playing fast and loose with Americans private
details.
They complain that Matrix houses restricted police and government files
on colossal databases that sit in the offices of Seisint Inc., a Boca
Raton, Fla., company founded by a millionaire whom police say flew planeloads
of drugs into the country in the early 1980s.
Its federally funded, its guarded by state police, but
its on private property? Thats very interesting, said
Christopher Slobogin, a University of Florida law professor and expert
in privacy issues. If its federally funded, the federal government
obviously has a huge interest in it.
ACCESS TO PERSONAL DATA
Matrix was initially intended to track terrorists, as was the Pentagons
Terrorism Information Awareness project, which sparked a congressional
uproar and got watered down.
As a dozen more states pool their criminal and government files with Floridas,
Matrix databases are expanding in size and power. Organizers hope to coax
more states to join, touting its usefulness in everyday policing.
It gives investigators access
to personal data, like boat registrations and property deeds, without
the governments possibly violating the 1974 Privacy Act by owning
the files.
But California and Texas dropped out, citing, among other things, worries
over housing sensitive files at Seisint. And a competing data vendor,
ChoicePoint, decided not to bid on the project, saying it lacked adequate
privacy safeguards.
Aspects of the project appear designed to steer around federal laws that
bar the U.S. government from collecting routine data on Americans.
CIA MAY GET ACCESS
For instance, the project is billed as a tool for state and local police,
but organizers are considering giving access to the Central Intelligence
Agency, said Phil Ramer, special agent in charge of the Florida Department
of Law Enforcements intelligence office.
In the 1970s, Congress barred the CIA from scanning files on average Americans,
after the agency was cited for spying on civil rights leaders.
The CIA doesnt have this now, Ramer said. Thats
a major political issue well have to cross.
Florida officials have acknowledged that users of Matrix, which stands
for Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange, can monitor
innocent citizens.
Ramer and others say, however, that unscrupulous spying will be prevented
through Florida police oversight of Matrix users, along with audits and
background checks on people with access to the database.
LAPSES IN OVERSIGHT?
Criminal history files in the database are maintained by 15 Seisint employees,
watched over by Florida state police, Ramer said.
Yet a Florida Department of Law Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated
Press shows potential lapses in oversight. The memo says background checks
on Seisints Matrix workers took place only last month, more than
a year into the program, and a privacy policy governing the databases
use has yet to be finalized.
Seisint declined to comment, referring a reporter to Seisints public
relations representative, Amber Zentis of Qorvis Communications, who asked
that questions be e-mailed. The company did not answer those questions.
© 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not
be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|